How the power players do it - by Fortune editor at large Patricia Sellers
Type Size  -  +
November 16, 2009, 1:05 pm

Men and women at work: Can we talk?

Guest Post by Sharon Meers, co-author of Getting to 50/50

Blue shirt photo low resolution

Photo courtesy of Vince Tarry

Do men resent powerful women?

One of the most intriguing statistics in “A Woman’s Nation,” the recently released survey by Maria Shriver and the Center for American Progress, is this: 69% of women think men resent women who have more power than they do. Only 49% of men agree.

Who knows who’s right. What we know for sure is that men and women can’t agree about power–and aren’t very comfortable talking candidly about it.

To research Getting to 50/50, the book I wrote with Joanna Strober, we found that fear of candid talk is the biggest logjam blocking the progress of women in the workplace. For one thing, men shy away from giving women honest feedback. One male CEO of a tech start-up told us: “Every senior male executive I know has been threatened with discrimination charges regardless of the goodness of their track record.” He added, “I’ve seen it make cynics out of a lot of men who started out very differently.”

All of us–men and women alike–contribute to this problem. In our politically correct workplaces, discussing male/female differences has become so taboo that the topic is broached only in heated moments, when colleagues let loose their true opinions about gender and power.

It’s a messy management issue. HR lawyers say that employers ask how to avoid suits when their priority should be retaining and promoting women, with the help of honest dialogue about everything from performance issues to maternity leaves.

But too often, men cower at giving feedback to female subordinates. That CEO of the tech start-up confessed that when he was at a big media company, his peers advised him to leave his office door open during reviews of female employees–and best to stay within earshot of his assistant so he’d have a witness if the employee made a complaint. “How much candor can you offer with your door open?” he asked me rhetorically, with understandable exasperation.

Moreover, lots of line managers keep women out of their networks (and even avoid going out to lunch with them) because it just doesn’t feel comfortable. Many managers steer clear of difficult conversations. Don’t be too hard on the guys: They’ve never been told how to engage the right way.

Rod Kramer, a professor and management expert at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, believes that men’s discomfort relates to a common insecurity: “Men often seem to think (heroically) that they should be masters at the conversation–that they should know the ‘right’ things to say.” His advice to men and women: “Be more curious about each other and their experiences. Just ask good leading questions–and invite questions in return.”

Meanwhile, women’s tendency to be super-serious (as men perceive them, at least) compounds the workplace dysfunction. “Women can make anything a chore,” a former Microsoft (MSFT) executive told me. “They’re too serious and don’t seem to understand that work is a game.”

What should women do? One of our interviewees, Larry, a partner in a national architecture firm, told us about a woman who blew up over her male colleagues’ risqué pin-ups and jocular behavior; she complained to HR and quit. Larry wishes that she had confronted the guys who offended her: “Tell guys to their face,” he says, advising women in general. “Say, ‘Hey, what’s that?’ And be funny about it. You have to do it in a way so that guys don’t feel threatened, but you are making your point.”

In the stories we heard, “right” and “wrong” were rarely obvious. But the need for a male/female lingua franca was clear.

Some wise employers are getting a jump on inventing this new language.

Deloitte, for one, has moved aggressively to bring male and female executives together to discuss questions like “Would you want your daughter to work for a company that has lower expectations for women?” Open dialogue and better insight into what women need to be successful has helped Deloitte command a lead among professional services firms in utilizing female talent.

The University of Michigan has also made strides. With backing from the National Science Foundation, the University enlisted male professors to comb research on implicit gender attitudes. For example, most people will select a resume with a male name over one with a female name, even when the resumes are identical. Professors turned their survey into a workshop and shared their insights with the University’s hiring committees. Female science hires have since risen dramatically.

It may be a long while ’til we reach 50/50. But understanding the issues and learning to understand each other is a good start.

Sharon Meers is the co-author of Getting to 50/50 and a former Managing Director at Goldman Sachs (GS).

4 Comments | Add a Comment | Email

Interesting article considering that I just went through a situation where all the upper manager were males and I was told by one of them that the others were intimidated, thus stunting my further advancement within that corporation. How sad that people continue to judge people by sex or race and so on…
The other thing is..who does one put a grievance in with? All the Board of Directors are male and the executives buddies…I would love to police these type of corporations for this behaviour and slap heavy fines on them.

Posted By jw vancouver, bc : December 2, 2009 9:45 am

It’s great that people are working on this issues. But why does the article only discuss things from a male perspective? What do women think about men in the workplace? What about female managers having to take steps to protect themselves from angry male employees? These questions aren’t addressed at in this article.

We can’t have a dialog if only one side gets a chance to speak.

Posted By HG, blomington, IN : November 24, 2009 7:57 pm

I think that these questions should be raised within a controlled meeting ( guided discussion) at every work section. Women are generally more passive than men. Men are generally more agressive. Pride is still a factor, who has not been insulted when someone younger or deemed less experienced is placed above the rest. Didn’t Milton’s Paradise lost discuss this?
In the Military, you have proven performance and leadership is far better defined and is a far better gauge of this, due to the military covers a greater percentage of the country.
Also, in the money Manager’s position, performance is money, and Karen Finnerman (CNBC Fast Money) is a well proven performer and money manager.
Because after all, there are more colors in money than skin. And it is far sexier than any model I have seen.

Posted By Brian Pierce, CA : November 17, 2009 3:58 pm

The points you make are excellent. There is lots of discomfort in the prospect of open conversations between men and women in the work place. It is also important to acknowledge that women are uncomfortable raising certain conversations with men. For example, women who have male sponsors and mentors don’t often ask – “How will we make sure I am introduced to people in your network?” These introductions may not happen “naturally” because the male sponsor and female sponsee or mentee don’t go out for a drink after work or play golf together. Until things change, the burden of opening these conversations falls on those who are not in the power group that determines the rules of the culture. Like it or not ladies, unless we have to play a role in putting the conversation on the table, things may not change very much.

Anne Perschel, Leadership and Business Psychologist
President, Germane Consulting
Passionate advocate and unstoppable force for advancing women leaders

Posted By Anne Perschel, Worcester, MA : November 16, 2009 11:48 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Anne Mulcahy Anne Mulcahy: A new global challenge
Chairman of Xerox
Sheryl Sandberg Sheryl Sandberg: Don't leave before you leave
COO of Facebook
Sukhinder Singh Cassidy Sukhinder Singh Cassidy: 10 career guidelines
CEO of Polyvore
From CEO to candidateFormer eBay boss Meg Whitman talks about her plans for California. Watch
Paula Deen's American dreamRestaurant entrepreneur and Food Network star shares her life story. Watch
Pattie SellersPatricia Sellers has written some of Fortune's most talked-about cover stories, including "Can Meg Whitman Save California?", Melinda Gates ("The $100 Billion Woman"), "MySpace Cowboys," Martha Stewart ("I cannot be destroyed"), Ted Turner ("Gone with the Wind") and Oprah Winfrey ("Oprah Inc."). And she has broken ground with insightful pieces on career management issues such as ego ("Get Over Yourself!"), and "Charisma: Do You Need It? Can You Get It?" Pattie chairs the annual Fortune Most Powerful Women Summit, the preeminent gathering of women leaders in business, philanthropy, government, academia, and the arts. And she has helped oversee Fortune's "Most Powerful Women in Business" cover package since its launch in 1998. She started at Fortune in 1984, covering the big consumer brand companies.
Subscribe to Postcards: RSS feed | email newsletter

Every year Fortune and the U.S. State Department sponsor the Global Women Leaders Mentoring Partnership, which brings rising-star women from developing countries to the U.S. to work closely with participants of the annual Fortune Most Powerful Women Summit - among them CEOs Andrea Jung of Avon, Ann Moore of Time Inc., and Ursula Burns of Xerox.

Please create a screen name to access this feature.

Screen name (Select one with 3-12 characters; Numbers and letters only)


Forgot password

Enter your e-mail address below and we will send you an e-mail with a link and code to reset your password.

E-mail

Already have the reset code?

Password selection

E-mail

Reset code

New password

Log in & let's get started!

E-mail

Password

Forgot password?


Not a member yet?

Sign up now for a free account

Sign up or log in

Screen name

Select one with 3-12 characters;
Numbers and letters only

E-mail

Make sure you typed it correctly.
You will receive an e-mail to validate your account

Password

Make it 6-10 characters, no spaces

We're Sorry!

This service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.


 

 


Thanks!

Please check your e-mail and click the link to confirm your membership. Then, you'll be ready to participate in all activities and conversations on our site.

Go to your Profile page


* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.